Utilising the omega-3 index to assess the relative bioimpact of a whole
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v16i3.1947Abstract
Background: Epidemiological studies indicate chronic global underconsumption of dietary omega-3 fatty acids with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. Omega-3 supplements are frequently used to address this deficit. However, whole fish contains an array of other fatty acids with additional putative health benefits. The health outcomes of omega-3 supplementation trials have been highly variable, in contrast to trials assessing regular fish consumption.
Objective: Our goal was to evaluate the biological impact (bioimpact) of a whole salmon oil (OmeGo) compared to a commonly used, concentrated omega-3 oil. OmeGo is produced from fresh salmon using a patented protease hydrolysis process, leaving the salmon oil’s natural food matrix intact. This could feasibly improve the oil’s bioavailability and bioimpact.
Methods: In this randomized, active-controlled interventional study, 84 healthy subjects were randomized to receive OmeGo or an omega-3 supplement for 14 weeks to assess changes in red blood cell eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) quantified as the omega-3 index (O3I). Inflammatory biomarkers and sleep quality, two important determinants of well-being, were also assessed.
Results: Despite OmeGo containing 2.5-fold less EPA and DHA, the increase in O3I from baseline was 1.7-fold greater than the active comparator, corresponding to a 4.3-fold greater increase in O3I per 100mg of EPA+DHA (p = 0.001). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) all decreased to a greater extent in the OmeGo group, with between-group differences reaching statistical significance for hsCRP (p < 0.01) and TNF-α (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that a fish oil retaining its intact food matrix and natural omega-3 fatty acids levels is more bioavailable and better replicates the health benefits of regular fish consumption compared to a commonly used concentrated EPA/DHA supplement.
Novelty of Study: This study challenges the prevailing assumption that concentrated omega-3 supplementation is the most effective strategy for compensating for inconsistent fish consumption and attaining the health benefits associated with regular fish intake.
Keywords: omega-3 index; salmon oil, polyunsaturated fatty acids; eicosapentaenoic acid; docosahexaenoic acid; C-reactive protein; tumour necrosis factor-α; interleukin-6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Crawford Currie, Tor Åge Myklebust, Christian Bjerknes, Bomi Framroze

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their articles and grant the Functional Food Center (FFC) and its journals the right of first publication under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, including commercial use, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited. Authors may post and share their published work freely, provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
By submitting to this journal, authors confirm that their manuscripts are original, not under consideration elsewhere, and that they hold the necessary rights to grant this license. The Functional Food Center encourages open scientific exchange and allows derivative and extended works, provided attribution to the original publication is maintained.